The formation of a new Syrian government in early 2025 has stirred cautious interest both regionally and internationally. While the reshuffling of ministers and bureaucratic elites within Damascus is nothing new in Syria’s post-2011 political culture, this latest iteration of the government presents subtle but important shifts in security posture, alliances, and regional balances of power.

The cabinet, as announced by the Syrian Presidency, maintains a tight Ba'athist grip with loyalists placed in key ministries such as Defense, Interior, and Information. However, several mid-level appointments suggest a pragmatic tilt toward technical administrators, likely to appease Russian advisors who have long criticized inefficiencies in governance. Notably, the Ministry of National Reconciliation has been revived in a symbolic nod to "intra-Syrian dialogue," though its actual influence remains marginal.

Security-wise, the new government has pledged a "comprehensive stabilization campaign" in central and eastern Syria. This campaign, according to official statements, will rely on enhanced coordination between the Syrian Arab Army (SAA), pro-Iran militias, and Russian military police. In practice, however, this renewed assertiveness appears limited to strategic corridors—particularly in Deir ez-Zor and along the Homs-Raqqa axis—where Russian interest in energy infrastructure intersects with Syrian regime goals.

Civilian life in government-held cities remains marked by rising checkpoints, arbitrary detentions, and continued power shortages. The mukhabarat networks are showing signs of internal friction as different branches compete for influence in the new security landscape, especially with shifting loyalties among tribal militias and former opposition fighters integrated under Russian-brokered reconciliation deals.

For the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the new government's rise has brought a mixture of caution and defiance. The SDF's leadership, particularly from the PYD-linked political structure, has expressed skepticism regarding Damascus' intentions, especially after recent government overtures calling for the "reintegration of all national forces under one flag."

Negotiations between the Autonomous Administration and the Syrian state have stalled since the beginning of 2025. While Russia has pushed for renewed dialogue, Iranian-backed militias have escalated tensions near SDF-controlled zones, particularly in Hasakah and along the Euphrates River. These skirmishes underscore the persistent ambiguity in the regime's approach: publicly calling for unity while covertly pressuring Kurdish forces militarily and economically.

Turkey, watching closely, remains concerned that any reconciliation between the SDF and Damascus might embolden the YPG—still considered by Ankara as indistinguishable from the PKK. As a result, Turkish-backed Syrian National Army (SNA) factions have been placed on high alert near Tal Tamr and Ain Issa, anticipating either regime advances or SDF preemptive moves.

The Islamic State (ISIS), while no longer holding territory, has continued its insurgency in the central desert (al-Badiyah) and remote stretches of eastern Syria. The new Syrian government’s promises of security restoration have done little to curtail the group’s activities. In fact, the relative instability caused by shifting control between regime forces, Iranian militias, and Russian patrols has allowed ISIS cells to reassert influence among disaffected tribal elements.

SDF intelligence units, supported by the U.S.-led coalition, have launched several operations against ISIS sleeper cells in Deir ez-Zor and southern Hasakah. However, the lack of a unified security framework between SDF zones and regime areas has created vacuums in which ISIS thrives. In some cases, civilians are caught between ISIS threats and regime reprisals, leading to further alienation and a fragile security equilibrium.

Conclusion

The new Syrian government’s impact on the security landscape has so far been more cosmetic than transformative. While the regime seeks to project strength and sovereignty, the fragmented reality on the ground—marked by competing foreign interests, internal repression, and the resilience of ISIS—renders such narratives hollow.

For observers and policymakers alike, the following questions remain crucial:

1. Can the new Syrian government achieve meaningful reconciliation with the SDF, or will military pressure escalate in the northeast?
2. To what extent can the regime and its allies contain the ISIS insurgency without broader cooperation with non-state actors?
3. Will the regional actors—especially Turkey, Iran, and Russia—push for genuine stabilization, or continue to exploit Syria’s divisions for their own strategic gain?

Please feel free to share your insights on the article at: contact@humanhorizons.one